Evidence Hub

A Case Report of Phenotypic Discrepancy in Sex Determination and Implications for Genetic Testing and Counseling

Maamoon Mian, M. Allen, J. Tahiri, Charla Allen, P. H. Reddy

Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports, 2025

Abstract

This case report presents an extraordinary instance of a 7-month-old male infant with an XX chromosomal pattern—a genetic configuration typically associated with females—while displaying characteristic male physical traits. This anomaly challenges established concepts of sex determination and highlights the intricate interplay between genetic factors and phenotypic expression. The aim of this report is to delve into the clinical implications of this rare presentation and to explore its broader significance for understanding human sex development. The infant's mother, a 20-yearold primigravid Caucasian woman with a medical history of type 2 diabetes managed with Metformin and significant maternal obesity (BMI = 37), underwent a comprehensive prenatal evaluation, including Natera DNA testing. Initial genetic testing revealed an XX chromosomal pattern with a low risk for chromosomal abnormalities. However, subsequent ultrasounds revealed male genitalia, leading to further investigations for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Despite normal hormone levels and negative genetic screens for CAH, the newborn exhibited male physical characteristics at birth. This case underscores a significant discrepancy between genetic predictions and observed phenotype, highlighting the limitations inherent in current prenatal genetic testing technologies and the complexity of sex determination mechanisms. The discrepancy observed in this case underscores the critical need for a nuanced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free