Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Fibroblast Growth Factor‐21 Analogs for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Changhyeon Jeong, Nayoung Han, Nakyung Jeon, Su-jin Rhee, C. Staatz, Min-Soo Kim, In-hwan Baek

Clinical pharmacology and therapy, 2024

963 participants · 35 citations

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)‐21 analogs are potential therapeutic candidates for metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the FGF‐21 analogs, efruxifermin, pegbelfermin, and pegozafermin for MASH treatment. A comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials from five major databases was conducted. Primary efficacy outcomes focused on liver histological improvement, while secondary efficacy outcomes encompassed reductions in liver fat content and improvements in biochemical parameters. Safety outcomes examined included treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment‐related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Eight eligible studies involving 963 patients were included in this review. Compared with the placebo group, the FGF‐21 analog‐treated group exhibited significantly improved primary efficacy outcomes, specifically ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of MASH (risk ratio [RR] = 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27–2.62) and at least two‐point improvement in the non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score with no worsening of fibrosis (RR = 2.85; 95% CI = 2.06–3.95). Despite an increased risk of TEAEs (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08–1.27) and treatment‐related adverse events (RR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.40–2.19), FGF‐21 analogs exhibited an acceptable safety profile. FGF‐21 analogs were significantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 963 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free