Evidence Hub

Abstract number: ESOC2026LB39 effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with respiratory muscle training on dysphagia rehabilitation in patients with acute cerebral infarction: a randomized controlled trial

Min Xiong

European Stroke Journal, 2026

120 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims To investigate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with respiratory muscle training (RMT) on swallowing function recovery in patients with post-stroke dysphagia following acute cerebral infarction. Methods This single-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated by dysphagia. Participants were randomly allocated into three groups: combined intervention group (tDCS+RMT, n=40), tDCS group (n=40), and conventional therapy group (n=40). All groups received standard swallowing rehabilitation for 4 weeks. The combined group additionally received anodal tDCS (2mA, 20min/session) over the pharyngeal motor cortex and RMT using threshold inspiratory-expiratory devices. Outcomes were assessed using the Videofluoroscopic Dysphagia Scale (VDS), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and maximum inspiratory/expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks post-intervention. Results The combined intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in VDS scores (p<0.001), PAS scores (p=0.003), and FOIS levels (p<0.001) compared to both control groups. MIP and MEP increased significantly in the combined group (p<0.001). The incidence of aspiration pneumonia was lowest in the combined group (5.0% vs. 17.5% vs. 22.5%, p=0.042). Conclusions tDCS combined with RMT significantly enhances swallowing function recovery…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free