Evidence Hub

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in total joint arthroplasty: a comprehensive systematic review of what orthopaedic surgeons should know

Abdelaziz O, Zayed ZG, Khalafallah MA, Hanafy MA, Hadhoud AM, Elmenawi KA

Arthroplasty (London, England), 2026

318,143 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The rising prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) presents a significant clinical challenge, increasing the risk of postoperative complications. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as a potential perioperative optimization strategy, but their impact on TJA outcomes remains debated. This systematic review was conducted to synthesize the evidence on the risks and benefits of GLP-1 RA use in adult patients undergoing primary TJA-specifically, total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to June 16, 2025, for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and using GLP-1 RAs versus a control group. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, and postoperative outcomes were extracted. Due to significant heterogeneity and overlap in data sources, a narrative synthesis rather than meta-analysis of the findings was conducted. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies involving an aggregate total of 318,143 patients (114,365 THA, 125,505…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 318,143 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free