Evidence Hub

Clinical verification of levofloxacin mesylate vs levofloxacin

Jing Wang

Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin mesylate with levofloxacin in the treatment of bacterial infections. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. One hundred and twenty six patients with bacterial infections were divided into two groups. Levofloxacin mesylate groups sixty three patients, (M 30, F 33, age (41± s 6) a); Levofloxacin group sixty three patients, (M 36, F 27, age (40±9) a). The two groups were orally given levofloxacin mesylate or levofloxacin 100 mg, tid, for 7 14 d, respectively. RESULTS: The total clinical effective rates were 89% (56/63) in levofloxacin mesylate group and 84% (53/63) in levofloxacin group. The bacterial clearance rates were 89% and 89%. The adverse reaction rates were 21%(13/63) and 18%(11/63), respectively. There was no statistical significance between two groups ( P 0.05 ). CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin mesylate and levofloxacin are effective and safe in the treatment of bacterials infections.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free