Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of pleurodesis for lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

Hirokazu Iso, A. Miyanaga, Yozo Sato, Yukari Shirakura, Kaoruko Shinbu, Tomoyasu Inoue, A. Nagano, K. Misawa et al.

Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2025

26 participants

Abstract

Background Managing malignant pleural effusion (MPE) with pleurodesis is essential for symptom relief and minimizing the need for repeated thoracentesis. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most common complications associated with advanced lung cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of pleurodesis for MPE secondary to lung cancer with ILD remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pleurodesis in this population. Methods This study was a single-center retrospective analysis. The cases of pleurodesis in patients with MPE secondary to lung cancer complicated with ILD at Nippon Medical School Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. Results Of the 26 lung cancer patients with ILD who underwent pleurodesis were analyzed. Fourteen patients received talc and 12 patients received minocycline, respectively. Talc was used in 10 out of 14 patients with drug-induced ILD and radiation-induced lung injury (RILI). In contrast, minocycline was used in 10 out of 12 patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). One month after pleurodesis, the efficacy for pleural adhesions was 64.3% and 50.0% in the talc and minocycline groups. The presence of a partially expanded lung before pleurodesis was a predictive factor for failure [odds ratio: 7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20–40.83, P=0.04]. When excluding the patients presenting partially expanded lung, the efficacy rate was 77.8% and 71.4% in the…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free