Evidence Hub

Patient reported outcomes and improvements in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time in dapoxetine-treated MEN with lifelong or acquired premature ejaculation: phase 3 pooled analyses

Ira D. Sharlip, Chris G. McMahon, Harmut Porst, Stanley E. Althof, Fisseha Tesfaye, Margaret Rothman, David A. Rivas

The Journal of Urology, 2009

1 citation

Abstract

You have accessJournal of Urology1 Apr 2009PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES AND IMPROVEMENTS IN INTRAVAGINAL EJACULATORY LATENCY TIME IN DAPOXETINE-TREATED MEN WITH LIFELONG OR ACQUIRED PREMATURE EJACULATION: PHASE 3 POOLED ANALYSES Ira Sharlip, Chris G McMahon, Harmut Porst, Stanley E Althof, Fisseha Tesfaye, Margaret Rothman, and David Rivas Ira SharlipIra Sharlip More articles by this author , Chris G McMahonChris G McMahon More articles by this author , Harmut PorstHarmut Porst More articles by this author , Stanley E AlthofStanley E Althof More articles by this author , Fisseha TesfayeFisseha Tesfaye More articles by this author , Margaret RothmanMargaret Rothman More articles by this author , and David RivasDavid Rivas More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(09)61385-9AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES AND IMPROVEMENTS IN INTRAVAGINAL EJACULATORY LATENCY TIME IN DAPOXETINE-TREATED MEN WITH LIFELONG OR ACQUIRED PREMATURE EJACULATION: PHASE 3 POOLED ANALYSES." The Journal of Urology, 181(4S), pp. 489–490 © 2009 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 181 Issue 4S April 2009 Page: 489-490 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2009 by American Urological AssociationMetrics Author Information Ira Sharlip More articles by this author Chris G McMahon More articles by this author Harmut Porst…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free