Evidence Hub

The efficacy of tadalafil in clinical populations

Lewis RW, Sadovsky R, Eardley I, O'Leary M, Seftel A, Wang WC, Shen W, Walker DJ et al.

The journal of sexual medicine, 2005

2,102 participants · 66 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) by demographic and ED characteristics, in patients having various comorbid medical conditions, and in patients receiving drug treatment for other medical conditions.

METHODS: This is an analysis of 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with 2,102 men with a broad spectrum of ED etiology and various comorbid medical conditions as participants. The variables analyzed in this report included race, age, body mass index (BMI), ED etiology, ED severity, ED duration, smoking, prior sildenafil use, presence of comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia), and treatment with antihypertensives or antidepressants. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tadalafil 10 mg (N=321), tadalafil 20 mg (N=1,143), or placebo (N=638). The primary efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and the mean per-patient percentage of "yes" responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary question 3 (SEP3--successful intercourse). The Global Assessment Question 1 (GAQ) was evaluated, as was the percentage of men attaining a normal IIEF EF domain score at end point.

RESULTS: Patients taking tadalafil 10 mg or 20 mg demonstrated significant improvement (P<0.005) from baseline to end point on the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,102 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free