Evidence Hub

Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia manifested as pulmonary nodules and cavitary lesions: a case report

H. Zhong, Danhui Huang, Yuying Lin, Pei Yang, Hongguang Shi, Shuang Yang, Shao-Xi Cai, Hang-Ming Dong

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia (CPP) typically presents with exudative and consolidative changes on chest computed tomography (CT), including lung consolidation, bronchial air trapping, pleural effusion, and ground-glass opacities. Here, we report an atypical case of CPP manifesting as pulmonary nodules and cavitary lesions, which was subsequently diagnosed through targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). A previously healthy 16-year-old male adolescent developed a severe cough with scant mucoid sputum, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea after cleaning his dormitory, with symptoms lasting nearly one month. Initial laboratory tests revealed normal infection-related markers, including white blood cell (WBC) count, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT), while chest CT showed pulmonary nodules and a small cavitary lesion. Based on the clinical presentation of persistent cough and the absence of significant inflammatory markers, empirical therapy with intravenous doxycycline was initiated, resulting in significant symptom improvement. After discharge, failure to follow the recommended dosing schedule and non-standardized use of oral doxycycline (including missed doses and co-administration with milk) compromised treatment efficacy. A follow-up CT demonstrated partial improvement in the right lung lesion but progression in the left, prompting a switch to cephalosporin, which proved ineffective. Referred to our hospital, bronchoscopy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free