Evidence Hub

Association of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use with cardiovascular and renal outcomes in male kidney transplant recipients with benign prostatic hyperplasia or erectile dysfunction

Hsu JY, Li JR, Chen CS, Yang CJ

International urology and nephrology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

PURPOSE

Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are commonly prescribed for erectile dysfunction (ED) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but their cardiovascular and renal associations in this population remain unexamined. This study evaluated these associations in male KTRs with ED or BPH.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX Global Collaborative Network data (January 2015-December 2023). Male KTRs ≥ 40 years with ED or BPH were identified using a unified diagnosis index date in both arms, with PDE5 inhibitor exposure bounded to days 0-365. Three drug strata (tadalafil 5 mg daily, tadalafil, sildenafil) were propensity-matched 1:1 against controls on thirty covariates. Balance was assessed by standardized mean differences. Primary outcomes (all-cause mortality, MACE excluding death, MAKE excluding death) were analyzed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Secondary outcomes comprised individual components (AMI, stroke, and dialysis initiation).

RESULTS

All-cause mortality was inversely associated with PDE5 inhibitor exposure across all six strata (HR 0.574-0.697). MACE excluding death was inversely associated in the ED cohort for tadalafil 5 mg daily (HR 0.527) and tadalafil all doses (HR 0.620), but not sildenafil; no composite associations reached significance in the BPH cohort. Two secondary outcomes survived Benjamini-Hochberg correction: MACE excluding death and AMI in the ED tadalafil all-doses…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free