Evidence Hub

Injectable Particulated Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Booster for Skin Restoration: An Integrated Randomized, Split-Face, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial and Preclinical Study

Young-In Lee, Nam Hao Chau, Ngoc Ha Nguyen, S. Ham, Yujin Baek, Jihee Kim, Ju-Hee Lee

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2026

20 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Injectable skin boosters currently in use mainly provide short-lived volumization or depend on inflammation-mediated collagen stimulation, raising concerns regarding durability and safety. Injectable particulate human acellular dermal matrix (phADM) is a biologically derived extracellular matrix scaffold designed to support constructive dermis remodeling. This randomized, split-face, double-blinded clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of phADM as a facial skin booster in 20 adults with moderate cheek roughness. phADM was injected on one facial side, with hyaluronic acid serving as the contralateral control. Multiple skin parameters were assessed over 20 weeks using validated imaging and biophysical instruments. Mechanistic validation was conducted using complementary in vitro, ex vivo human skin, and in vivo rat models. Clinically, the phADM-treated side demonstrated greater improvements in skin density, volume, elasticity, wrinkle depth, pore area, hydration, and barrier-related parameters at multiple time points compared with HA. In ex vivo human skin, phADM showed homogeneous dermal distribution and preservation of extracellular matrix architecture, along with restoration of basement membrane-associated proteins following UVB irradiation. In vivo rat studies revealed fibroblast infiltration and localized neocollagenesis within the implanted matrix. In vitro assays further indicated enhanced fibroblast proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis, increased hyaluronan…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free