Evidence Hub

Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysm by ex situ Repair and Autotransplantation: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Yi-Tian Fang, H. Kimenai, R. D. de Bruin, Dorottya K. de Vries, Bart-Jeroen Petri, M. C. Warlé, I. Tielliu, J. V. van Laanen et al.

European Surgical Research, 2024

9 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) is a rare vascular disease with a mortality rate of up to 80% upon rupture. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of ex situ repair and autotransplantation for endovascularly untreatable RAA. Methods: A retrospective nationwide cohort study was conducted in RAA patients undergoing ex situ repair and autotransplantation in the Netherlands. Surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and graft outcomes were assessed. Results: Ex situ repair was performed in 9 patients with 11 RAAs. Eight RAAs were located at the first bifurcation, one on the main trunk, one on the first branch, and one on the second branch. Nephrectomy was performed via laparoscopy (n = 7), robotic-assisted laparoscopy (n = 1), and laparotomy (n = 1). Postoperative complications were recorded in 4 patients, including bowel obstruction, delirium, pneumonia, and hydronephrosis due to double-J dislocation. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 83 mL/min/1.73 m2 pretransplant and 88 mL/min/1.73 m2 posttransplant. By an average follow-up of 32 months, 2 patients had died due to lung adenocarcinoma and stroke, while all autotransplanted kidneys had good patency and remained functional. Conclusions: Ex situ repair and autotransplantation are safe and feasible for endovascularly untreatable RAA cases. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up periods are necessary to further evaluate the role of this surgical approach.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free