Evidence Hub

Silodosin in treating men With BPH-associated lower urinary tract Symptoms: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jiajie Li, Chengbo Ai, Chi Yuan, Kai Wang, Longdi Yu, Zhongyu Jian, Qiu-Ping Luo, Xuefeng Ma

International Journal of Surgery, 2025

6,831 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of silodosin-a highly selective α₁A-adrenoceptor antagonist-with placebo, tamsulosin, naftopidil, and alfuzosin in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science until February 2024. Studies were selected based on predefined PICOS criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB tool. A frequentist random-effects NMA was performed; heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 statistic, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's and Begg's tests. Treatment rankings were based on surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities.

RESULTS

Twenty-five RCTs (n = 6,831) were included. NMA showed silodosin significantly improved voiding symptoms versus tamsulosin (MD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.01-0.56) and total IPSS versus naftopidil (P < 0.001). Silodosin monotherapy ranked highest for symptom improvement (SUCRA: 93.3-97.5%). However, it was associated with higher overall adverse events versus tamsulosin (RR = 1.26, P < 0.001) and significantly increased risk of retrograde ejaculation versus placebo (RR = 24.94, P < 0.001). Combination therapy with tadalafil improved urinary flow (SUCRA = 56.7%).

CONCLUSION

Silodosin is highly effective for BPH-LUTS,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,831 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free