Evidence Hub

Management of inflammatory cardiopulmonary manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

Hao Y, Montes R, Oon S, Nikpour M

Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2026

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) refers to a group of serious manifestations, with a high prevalence for some, such as pericarditis and pleuritis, and high mortality in others, such as lupus myocarditis (LM) and diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH). There is a paucity of systematic literature reviews on the management of inflammatory cardiopulmonary manifestations in SLE. We aimed to assess the available evidence in this area.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from January 1990 to June 2025 using keywords related to the cardiac and pulmonary systems, SLE, and treatments. Manifestations related to atherosclerosis or anti-phospholipid syndrome were excluded.

Results: A total of 67 studies, covering pericarditis, LM, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), pleuritis, acute lupus pneumonitis (ALP), DAH, interstitial lung disease, and shrinking lung syndrome (SLS) were included. Glucocorticoids (GCs) were utilized as first-line treatment for all these conditions, and GC pulse was commonly administered in serious manifestations such as pericardial tamponade, LM, ALP, and DAH. Cyclophosphamide was the most used immunosuppressant, with low-to-moderate evidence indicating its effectiveness. Low-to-moderate evidence supported rituximab as a second-line therapy for LM, DAH, and SLS, and plasma exchange was commonly used in DAH. For PAH, high-quality evidence from RCTs supported the use of PAH-targeted therapies, and initial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free