Evidence Hub

Real-World Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Seven-Year Single-Center Cohort Study from Taiwan

Wei-Hung Chang, Ting-Yu Hu, Li-Kuo Kuo

Life, 2025

64 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Severe sepsis and septic shock remain major contributors to ICU mortality. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been widely adopted as adjunctive therapy in Asian ICUs for endotoxemia, but its real-world effectiveness and prognostic factors remain uncertain, especially in high Gram-negative settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 64 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who received at least one session of PMX-HP in a 25-bed tertiary medical ICU in Taiwan between July 2013 and December 2019. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and treatment data were extracted. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Prognostic factors were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 66.1 ± 12.3 years; 67.2% were male. Pneumonia (29.7%) and intra-abdominal infection (18.8%) were the most common sources of sepsis, with E. coli and K. pneumoniae as leading pathogens. Median APACHE II score at ICU admission was 26 (IQR 21–32), and 79.7% received two PMX-HP sessions. The 28-day mortality rate was 46.9%, with ICU and hospital mortality both 53.1%. Non-survivors were older, had higher APACHE II scores, and more frequent use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Positive changes in vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) after PMX-HP were also more common among non-survivors. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age, higher APACHE II score, and CRRT requirement as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: In this…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 64 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free