Evidence Hub

Multi-pharmacological treatment for young subfertile males with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Lee DH, Yu YD

Investigative and clinical urology, 2024

50 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) treatments using multiple pharmaceutical agents that could simultaneously preserve or enhance fertility capability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center-based, randomized controlled study, whereas the final analysis evaluated a total 350 CP/CPPS patients (age range, 28-40 years) and 50 patients were randomly allocated to each therapeutic group, with a 1:1 ratio. The therapeutic groups consist of tadalafil (group 1, 5 mg daily), L-carnitine (group 2, 2 g daily), Serenoa repens extract (group 3, 320 mg daily), group 4 (tadalafil+L-carnitine), group 5 (tadalafil+S. repens), group 6 (L-carnitine+S. repens), and group 7 (tadalafil+L-carnitine+S. repens). The treatment outcomes at 3 months post-therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS: At 3 months post-therapy, the mean total sperm motility was significantly improved in all groups. A normal morphology improvement was observed in L-carnitine receiving groups. The mean total score on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) showed the greatest reduction in intensity in group 7. Logistic regression analyses showed that group 5 and group 7 were significantly associated with improvements in total IPSS and total NIH-CPSI scores at 3 months post-therapy. Group 7 was a significant predictor for improving total sperm motility,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free