Evidence Hub

N-acetylcysteine as a promising treatment for COVID-19: A comprehensive meta-analysis of systemic manifestations and clinical outcomes

Helmy S. Saleh, Ahmed B. Zaid, Shaimaa K. Almahdy, Alshimaa Mohamed Elmalawany, Ahmed Abdeen, Ilhaam Alsaati, Samah Fathy Ibrahim

Italian Journal of Food Science, 2025

20,980 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic presents systemic disorders, primarily affecting respiratory and cardiovascular systems. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) possesses antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulating properties, suggest-ing a potential therapy against COVID-19. In the current study, a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of NAC supplementation against COVID-19. A literature search was conducted from April 2019 to December 2023 using Rev-Man 5.3 incorporating 14 studies with 20,980 participants. Results revealed significant differences in total and native thiol, and hydrogen sulfides in COVID-19 patients. NAC-treated patients exhibited significant reduction in C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels, along with higher pO2/FiO2 ratios, minimal stay in hospital, and lower mortalities supporting the efficacy of NAC toward COVID-19. Please see corrigendum at: https://itjfs.com/index.php/ijfs/article/view/3625

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20,980 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free