Evidence Hub

Randomized controlled trial of vericiguat in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction causing stable chest pain (V-COM): study protocol for a randomized control trial

Lo CK, Ip NH, Sin TH, Ho SY, Wong CK, Tam FC, Lam SC, Yiu KH et al.

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2026

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that ∼50% of patients with stable chest pain have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), yet remain at higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to patients without chest pain. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a major cause of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). While therapies for CMD are lacking, Vericiguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, has shown improvement in coronary microvascular circulation in animal studies. Quantitative stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows the quantification of stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). This study aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine if Vericiguat improves MBF and MPR in patients with stable chest pain and INOCA caused by CMD.

Methods/design: V-COM is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Ninety-four patients aged 40-80 years with recurrent stable chest pain, nonobstructive coronary arteries on recent coronary computed tomography (CT) or invasive angiography, and CMD defined by stress CMR (MPR <2.19 or stress MBF <2.19 mL/g/min) will be recruited across six centers in Hong Kong. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to vericiguat plus optimal medical therapy (intervention) or optimal medical therapy alone (control). Vericiguat will be prescribed once daily for 6 months, starting at 2.5 mg and titrated up to a target dose of 10 mg based on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free