Evidence Hub

Optimal markers of treatment response to vasodilatory drugs in small vessel disease: An OxHARP trial analysis

Webb AJS, Feakins K, Lawson A, Stewart C, Thomas J, Llwyd O

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2026

69 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background and Aims: Vasodilating drugs targeting the endothelium could reduce long-term harms due to cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) but there are no commonly accepted methods to measure short-term disease activity or drug response. In the OxHARP clinical trial, we determined the most sensitive physiological markers of treatment response to sildenafil versus placebo on either transcranial ultrasound (TCD) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their validity compared to disease severity and other measures of other physiological mechanisms. Methods: In the OxHARP double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial we measured aortic blood pressure, mean flow velocity (MFV), cerebral pulsatility, cerebrovascular conductance index (CVCi = MFV/aortic mean BP), cerebral perfusion (pcASL-MRI) and cerebrovascular reactivity to inhaled CO2 on TCD (CVR-TCD) and MRI in white (CVR-WM), gray (CVR-GM) and white matter hyperintensities (CVR-WMH). Effects of 3 weeks of sildenafil were compared to placebo. Validity of markers were determined by between-visit repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)); associations with CVR-TCD, CVR-WMH and CVR-GM; associations with other markers; the magnitude of response, and sensitivity, to sildenafil. Results: In 69 participants, repeatability was greatest for MFV, pulsatility, CVCi and CVR-WMH (ICC > 0.8), very good for CVR-TCD and GM-perfusion (ICC > 0.7), and good for CVR-GM (ICC > 0.6). CVR-TCD was associated with CVR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 69 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free