Evidence Hub

Macitentan and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor alone or in combination in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension: a pooled analysis

McLaughlin VV, Sauvageot N, Hennessy B, Panjabi S, Paoli CJ, Linder J, Bayer B, Söderberg S et al.

JHLT open, 2026

2,201 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Upfront combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) is guideline-recommended for low- or intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study compared time to all-cause mortality for macitentan+PDE5i combination and each monotherapy.

METHODS: Long-term patient-level data (planned follow-up ≥1 year) were pooled from four clinical trials and three observational registries. All-cause mortality data were available from adults with incident PAH initiated on macitentan 10 mg or PDE5i monotherapy, or macitentan+PDE5i. Propensity-score (PS) methods balanced key demographic and disease characteristics across cohorts. Hazard ratios (HRs) were computed from a Cox-regression model that included PS-calculated weights. Weighted Kaplan-Meier estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed 6-monthly.

RESULTS: 2201 patients were included: 754 received macitentan+PDE5i (421 tadalafil, 324 sildenafil, 9 other), 654 macitentan, and 793 PDE5i (301 tadalafil, 490 sildenafil, 2 other). After weighting, characteristics were similar across cohorts. Upfront macitentan+PDE5i was associated with a 39% risk reduction of all-cause mortality versus PDE5i (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.46-0.82]) and 32% versus macitentan (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.37-0.95]). Reduction in all-cause mortality was 49% for macitentan+tadalafil vs tadalafil (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.30-0.85]), 43% for macitentan+tadalafil vs macitentan (HR 0.57 [95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,201 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free