Evidence Hub

Effect of tadalafil on male lower urinary tract symptoms: an integrated analysis of storage and voiding international prostate symptom subscores from four randomised controlled trials

C. Chapple, C. Roehrborn, K. McVary, D. Ilo, C. Henneges, L. Viktrup

European Urology, 2015

1,499 participants · 34 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) evaluates lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); the total score does not differentiate between storage and voiding and is unevenly weighted (four questions [57%] on voiding, three questions [43%] on storage).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative contributions of storage and voiding IPSS subscores to total IPSS at baseline and in response to treatment with tadalafil.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Integrated analysis of data from four placebo-controlled, 12-wk studies of tadalafil (5mg once daily) in 1499 men with LUTS/BPH.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships between total IPSS and the storage and voiding subscores were assessed using graphical exploration and linear regression modelling. Linear modelling was performed for the baseline and endpoint and for changes in subscores. The optimal storage subscore to total IPSS (S:T) ratio for IPSS improvement was identified using nonparametric regression and gradient-descent optimisation.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The contribution of storage and voiding subscores at baseline and endpoint was 38.8% and 61.2%, and 39.2% and 60.7%, respectively. This intuitive 40:60 storage-to-voiding ratio was similar at baseline and endpoint by treatment group and for changes in subscores, but spanned the entire range for individuals. Changes in total IPSS were greatest for a storage subscore percentage…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,499 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free