Evidence Hub

Tadalafil is sufficiently effective for severe chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Hiramatsu I, Tsujimura A, Soejima M, Yoshiyama A, Nagashima Y, Ishikawa K, Uesaka Y, Nozaki T et al.

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2020

12 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of tadalafil for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

METHODS: Tadalafil 5 mg was given each morning for 12 weeks to patients diagnosed as having either moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms. Voiding symptoms were compared between patients with a high (≥4; high group) and low (<4; low group) pain subscore of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index before and after tadalafil administration. The correlation between changes in the Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index and the International Prostate Symptom Score during treatment was also investigated.

RESULTS: At baseline, the pain subscore of the Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index was high (≥4) in 24 of 74 (32.4%) patients. The International Prostate Symptom Score in the group with a high pain subscore was significantly higher than that in the group with a low pain subscore. International Prostate Symptom Score, National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index total score and pain subscore were all significantly improved after treatment. The change in the Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index total score correlated positively with the change in the International Prostate Symptom Score. The decrease in the International Prostate Symptom Score was significantly greater in the group with high versus low pain subscore.

CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil is sufficiently effective in the treatment of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free