Evidence Hub

Evaluating the safety profile of α-1 blockers, 5α-reductase inhibitors, and PDE5I for BPH: a disproportionality analysis of real-world adverse events based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Zhao Z, Wu C, Xiong Y, Wang W, Qin F, Yuan J

The aging male : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-world safety profiles of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists (α1-blockers), 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 of 2004 to Q2 of 2025. Reports of adverse events (AEs) in male BPH patients receiving AUA guideline-recommended drugs including α-1 blockers (tamsulosin, silodosin, doxazosin, and alfuzosin), 5ARIs (finasteride and dutasteride), and tadalafil were extracted. Disproportionality analysis was performed to detect significant safety signals. AEs were classified using MedDRA terms.

RESULTS

Among 9,540 unique reports and 25,796 AEs entries, patients aged 65-80 years accounted for the majority of the reports. Most AEs occurred within 30 days of treatment initiation. Hospitalization was the most common serious outcome. Sixteen significant AEs were detected, including pollakiuria, gynecomastia, breast pain and so on, with distinct reporting patterns across drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis identified distinct post-marketing safety signals among guideline-recommended pharmacotherapies for BPH, confirming known risks and suggesting potential novel adverse-event signals warranting further investigation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free