Evidence Hub

Avanafil use in patients with erectile dysfunction and co-morbidities: Clinical insights from multiple aetiologies - A case series

Ismail SB, Zainon WMNW, Lotopi MAA, Nazri A

Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2025

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent medical problem affecting men globally, particularly those with co-morbidities such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes. This case series aimed to evaluate the effects of avanafil as a treatment option for patients with ED and other co-morbidities. Eight male patients from a family medicine clinic received either 100 mg or 200 mg avanafil based on their clinical indication. Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score. The outcomes included changes in the IIEF-5 score upon avanafil treatment. Our findings demonstrated a significant increase in the 200 mg avanafil treatment group, with the IIEF-5 score increasing from 14.83±9.4 to 24.17±2.6 (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the 100 mg avanafil treatment group (P=0.7903) and the overall avanafil treatment group (100 mg + 200 mg avanafil; P=0.0501). No adverse events were reported among the patients. Avanafil is considered a potentially safe and effective treatment option for ED, particularly in individuals with co-morbidities.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free