Evidence Hub

Experimental rodent models of chronic prostatitis: effect of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor on chronic pelvic-pain-related behavior

Yamaguchi H, Kurita M, Yoshinaga R, Asao Y, Oka M

Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica, 2019

2 citations

Abstract

Chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is commonly diagnosed in men younger than 50 years old. It is characterized by pelvic pain, voiding symptoms and sexual dysfunction. The considerable discomfort or pain experienced has a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and is a huge economic burden because of the high recurrence rate and the low cure rate. Appropriate animal models are essential for the development of new drugs for the treatment of CP/CPPS, and several rodent models induced by different methods and over different time frames have been established. This article reviews studies of three in vivo rodent models of prostatitis, namely, chemical-induced, autoimmune-induced and hormone-associated models reported by us and other investigators. Recent clinical investigation has suggested that tadalafil improves the International Prostatic Symptom Score and the total National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index score of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with CP/CPPS, which enables us to investigate the effect of tadalafil on the pelvic-pain-related behavior and prostatic inflammation in two of these prostatitis model types, experimental autoimmune prostatitis (EAP) and hormone/castration-induced prostatitis (HCP). Both models showed the pelvic-pain-related behavior and prostatic inflammation that are characteristic of chronic prostatitis. In EAP, tadalafil suppressed both the pelvic-pain-related behavior and the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free