Evidence Hub

Objective impacts of tadalafil on storage and voiding function in male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: 1-year outcomes from a prospective urodynamic study

Y. Matsukawa, S. Takai, T. Majima, Y. Funahashi, N. Sassa, Masashi Kato, Tokunori Yamamoto, M. Gotoh

World journal of urology, 2018

94 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the 1-year effects of tadalafil on storage and voiding function in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) based on a urodynamic study.

METHODS: In a one-armed, prospective study, 105 untreated outpatients with LUTS/BPH received 5 mg tadalafil every day for 12 months. Subjective symptoms and objective findings on voiding and storage functions, obtained through urodynamic studies that included cystometry and pressure flow study, were evaluated before, at 3 months, and at 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS: The analysis included 94 patients with a mean age of 70.7 years and a mean prostate volume of 44.5 mL. Subjective symptom parameters of LUTS were significantly ameliorated after 3 months, and progressively improved until study conclusion. Similarly, monitoring of storage and voiding functions revealed significant improvements after 3 months that continued to improve until 12 months. In 49 patients who revealed detrusor overactivity during cystometry at the baseline assessment, uninhibited detrusor contractions disappeared in 15 (30.6%) patients after 3 months (p = 0.02), and in 22 (44.9%) after 12 months (p < 0.001). Mean maximum flow rate significantly increased by 2.9 mL/s during the 12-month treatment (p < 0.001), whereas mean bladder outlet obstruction index significantly decreased from 59.5 at baseline to 45.7 at 3 months (p = 0.001), and to 42.9 at 12 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 94 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free