Evidence Hub

The role of ascorbic acid in reducing mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

W. Khokher, N. Kesireddy, Prabath Herath Mudiyanselage, S. Iftikhar, Azizullah Beran Beran, M. Alom, R. Rashid, H. Ali et al.

Chest, 2021

290 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

TOPIC: Chest Infections TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: The use of ascorbic acid or vitamin C in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is a topic of significant investigation. Some argue it decreases the rate of mortality in severe cases of COVID-19 pneumonia, while others argue that it provides no additional benefits to a patient's outcome. This literature review looks at patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, and investigates the role of high dose vitamin C (HDVC) in reducing mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and length of hospital stay. METHODS: A thorough search of the literature was conducted to perform a meta-analysis of the available studies that compared the efficacy of HDVC to standard care or placebo in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. This search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for data on the subject matter of study from inception to April 20, 2021. We considered randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series. From each study, we collected the number of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent treatment with either HDVC or standard care/placebo. The primary outcome was the rate of mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay and length of hospital stay. The random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 290 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free