Evidence Hub

Comparative Efficacy of On-demand Sildenafil, Tadalafil, and Daily Tadalafil for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A 12-week Randomized Controlled Study

Shevya Gagal, Ajeet Kumar Sidana, Abhinav Agrawal, Swarndeep Singh

Journal of Psychosexual Health, 2026

75 participants

Abstract

Background: Erectile problems are commonly associated with marital relationship problems, leading to dissatisfaction in marital life and poor quality of life (QoL). Objectives: To compare treatment satisfaction and sexual QoL (SQoL) outcomes among Sildenafil SOS, Tadalafil SOS, and Tadalafil daily regimen in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). Method: A 12-week, prospective, open-label, comparative, interventional study on 75 men diagnosed with ED as per ICD-11 criteria were randomly allocated to three study groups 25 in each: Group A (Sildenafil SOS), Group B (Tadalafil SOS) and Group C (Tadalafil daily), based on a computer-generated random number table. Dosage of the respective drugs was kept in the therapeutic range of up to 50–100 mg of Sildenafil on an SOS basis, up to 10–20 mg of Tadalafil on an SOS basis, and a 5 mg fixed dose of Tadalafil daily in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire for Males (SQoL-M) scales were administered. Results: Sildenafil SOS (Group A) showed higher EDITS scores at 4, 8, and 12 weeks ( P Group C) demonstrated significantly greater improvements in QoL from 4 to 12 weeks ( P < .01) compared to Group A. Conclusion: Sildenafil provided higher immediate satisfaction, while Tadalafil enhanced long-term QoL, supporting individualized, preference-based ED management.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 75 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free