Evidence Hub

Whole food diet induces remission in children and young adults with mild-moderate Crohn's disease and is more tolerable than exclusive enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial

Yonat Aharoni Frutkoff, L. Plotkin, D. Pollak, J. Livovsky, G. Focht, R. Lev-Tzion, O. Ledder, Amit Assa et al.

Gastroenterology, 2025

83 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tasty&Healthy (T&H) is a whole-food diet for Crohn's disease (CD), which excludes processed food, gluten, red meat, and dairy, without requiring formula or mandatory ingredients. TASTI-MM was a clinician-blinded, randomized-controlled trial comparing tolerability and effectiveness of T&H vs. exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN).

METHODS

Patients with biologic-naive mild-moderate CD aged 6-25 years were randomized to either T&H or EEN for 8 weeks, receiving weekly dietary support. Tolerability was evaluated by weekly interviews, questionnaires and intake diaries. Other outcomes included symptomatic remission, Mucosal-Inflammation Non-Invasive (MINI) index, calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Fecal microbiome was analyzed by metagenomics at baseline, week-4 and week-8. Data were analyzed by the intention-to-treat approach unless specified otherwise.

RESULTS

Among 83 included patients (41 T&H, 42 EEN; mean age 14.5±3.7 years), 88% tolerated T&H vs. 52% for EEN (aOR 7.7 [95%CI 2.4-25]; p<0.001). Calprotectin, CRP and ESR decreased significantly in both groups, with no between-group differences. Symptomatic remission was achieved in 56% of T&H group vs. 38% of the EEN group (aOR 2.5 [0.98-6.3], p=0.1; per-protocol: 67% vs. 76%; p=0.47). Calprotectin <250μg/g was achieved in 34% vs. 33% (aOR 0.97 [0.37-2.6], p=0.84) and MINI<8 in 44% vs. 31% (aOR 1.8 [0.7-4.5]; p=0.33). Microbiome α-diversity improved in the T&H arm and declined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 83 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free