Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of empirical Antibiotics for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Lior Cohen Yatziv, Emily Gilbert, Ruiwen Zhou, Cristina Vazquez Guillamet

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2026

Abstract

Abstract Background Empiric antibiotic selection for complicated urinary tract infections is increasingly complex due to the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare clinical efficacy and safety among existing empiric treatment options. Methods We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating single-agent empiric regimens for adults with complicated urinary tract infections. The primary endpoints were clinical response, microbiological response, and serious adverse events. Ceftriaxone served as the common comparator. Results Forty-seven trials were identified through a systematic search. In the primary analysis of 17 studies published after the year 2000, evaluating agents currently accessible in the United States, in which baseline ceftriaxone non-susceptibility among Enterobacterales averaged approximately 15%. Ceftriaxone demonstrated clinical response rates comparable to broader-spectrum alternatives. Although some agents achieved higher microbiological eradication, these differences did not translate into superior clinical cure rates. Safety profiles were stable across antibiotic classes, with no significant differences in serious adverse events compared to cephalosporins. Conclusions Ceftriaxone remains an effective empiric option for hemodynamically stable adults with complicated urinary tract infections, in settings with comparable resistance…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free