Evidence Hub

Burden, clinical impact, and primary antimicrobial resistance profiles of Helicobacter pylori infections in Cameroon: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eliane V. Assokom Okoubalimba, Judith G.L.F. Ekwe Priso, Idriss Ntatou Lemouchele, Danielle Christiane Kedy Koum, Martin Luther Koanga Mogtomo, Loick Pradel Kojom Foko

PLOS Global Public Health, 2026

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is one of the most widespread pathogens in humans and a strong predictor of gastric cancers. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420261375391) aimed at determining the extent, clinical impact, and antibiotic resistance profile of H. pylori infections in Cameroon. Six databases were exploited to identify relevant studies published between 2000 and 2026, as per PRISMA guidelines. Pooled proportions were computed using random effects models, while sensitivity analyses were performed to identify confounding factors. A total of 46 studies were included. The pooled proportion of H. pylori infection was 56.7% (95%CI 51.1 - 62.1%), with higher estimates found in i) clinical settings (57.0%), ii) the regions of Centre (62.2%) and Littoral (58.5%), iii) adults (59.7%), and individuals with gastrointestinal disorders (60.1%). The burden of H. pylori was positively correlated with gastric disease severity, with 64.5% of infection cases seen in gastric cancer. Infections have led to adverse clinical effects (e.g., anemia). H. pylori isolates were highly resistant to metronidazole (87.6%, 95%CI 62.4 - 96.8%), while the lowest resistant rates were found for levofloxacin (1.1%, 95%CI 0.4 - 3.2%) and rifampicin (0.6%, 95%CI 0.1 - 2.2%). An unusually high resistance rate to amoxicillin (93.4%; 95% CI 85.9-97.0%) was observed, warranting confirmatory studies. Multidrug-resistant isolates accounted for 77.6%. Several urgent challenges, including the lack…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free