Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori in Thailand: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chonticha Romyasamit, Conny Turni, Supanut Anusuriya, Thitinat Duangchan

Global Health Journal, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Background Rising antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori presents a significant challenge to therapy worldwide. In Thailand, success rates for treatment have decreased, and data on antimicrobial resistance remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the patterns and trends of H. pylori antimicrobial resistance in Thailand over time. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and the Thai-Journal Citation Index Centre were searched from database inception to 25 July 2025. Eligible studies reported antimicrobial susceptibility data for H. pylori isolates from Thai populations. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Antimicrobial resistance rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Subgroups were analyzed by testing method, geographical region, publication year, study quality, and study design. Meta-regression was conducted using publication year as a moderator to explore temporal trends. Results Twenty-five studies (28 datasets) with 5202 H. pylori isolates were included. Antimicrobial resistance rates were highest for metronidazole (38.0%); moderate for clarithromycin (10.0%), levofloxacin (10.6%), and ciprofloxacin (10.4%); and low for amoxicillin (3.9%) and tetracycline (2.9%). Clarithromycin resistance differed by testing method…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free