Evidence Hub

Development and OECD‐Guided Experimental Validation of Eigenvalue‐Based QSAR Models for Skin Permeation

Anish Gomatam, Manu Mathew, Jeffrey Pradeep Raj, Kavita Raikuvar, Saurabh Katawale, Hemali M. Savla, Krishna Iyer, Evans C. Coutinho

Journal of Applied Toxicology, 2026

Abstract

ABSTRACT In silico methods such as quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) are widely used in drug development for prescreening of ‘drug‐likeness’. Most of these tools correlate biological properties to two‐dimensional (2D) descriptors, which do not account for important structural elements pertaining to three‐dimensional (3D) geometry and shape. To address this, we have developed the ‘EigenValue Analysis’ (EVANS) methodology, a variant of QSAR in which descriptors are computed as a hybrid of 2D physicochemical properties and 3D geometry. Having previously applied EVANS to build QSAR models for several datasets across a range of endpoints relevant to drug discovery and development, we now apply EVANS to build QSAR models for transdermal permeation. A high‐quality dataset of 187 compounds with human skin permeability data was carefully curated using strict exclusion criteria. The EVANS methodology was applied and QSAR models were built correlating the calculated hybrid eigenvalues to the logarithmic skin permeability coefficient (log K p ) using multiple linear regression (MLR), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. The SVM‐based model built using five descriptors demonstrated the best performance. Further external validation was performed by retrieving 52 chemicals from the SkinPiX database, providing additional insight into the model's generalisability. The model was subsequently used to make predictions for two untested compounds…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free