Evidence Hub

Divergent Retrograde Signaling Pathways Coordinate Longevity and Metformin Responses in Complex I and Complex IV Deficient C. elegans

Chiamkunakorn C, Poothong J, Trakarnsanga K, Braeckman BP, Suthammarak W

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026

Abstract

Mild reductions in mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) capacity paradoxically extend organismal lifespan, a conserved phenomenon termed mitohormesis. While the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR mt ) and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) are both established regulators of this process, whether distinct mitochondrial lesions converge on a single, unified survival mechanism remains unclear. By systematically dissecting the genetic architectures governing longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans , we demonstrate that targeted RNAi knockdown of Complex I ( nuo-6 ) and Complex IV ( cco-1 ) subunits activates fundamentally divergent downstream pathways. Both structural defects robustly induce the UPR mt , yet lifespan extension from Complex I impairment highly dependent on the UPR mt master regulator ATFS-1 while bypassing the AMPK ortholog AAK-2. Conversely, Complex IV-mediated longevity operates independent of ATFS-1 but requires AAK-2-driven metabolic reprogramming. Pharmacological intervention with metformin—a Complex I inhibitor and AMPK activator—further exposed complex-specific vulnerabilities: metformin markedly suppressed the longevity phenotype of nuo-6;aak-2 mutants, whereas in cco-1;aak-2 animals it produced a trend toward lifespan extension that appeared independent of AAK-2. Together, these findings challenge the view of mitohormesis as a uniform response, revealing instead that cells engage specialized, molecularly tailored retrograde signaling…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free