Evidence Hub

Association of Ambient Air Pollution with Blood pressure in Adolescence: A Systematic-Review and Meta-analysis

T. S, Grande Aj, Karamanos A, Cruickshank Jk, Roever L, Mudway Is, Kelly Fj, A. S et al.

Current problems in cardiology, 2022

15,000 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

AIM

We systematically reviewed the association of ambient air pollution with blood pressure (BP) as a primary outcome in adolescents (10-19 years).

METHODS

Five databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and LILACS) were searched for relevant articles published up to August 2022. Meta-analyses were conducted using STATA v17 [Protocol - OSF Registries https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/96G5Q].

RESULTS

Eight studies (5 cohort, 3 cross-sectional) with approximately 15,000 adolescents were included. Data from six studies were suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. We found insignificant positive associations for cohort studies assessing long-term exposure to PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 on systolic and diastolic BP. At age 12 years old (3,799 participants), we found significant positive associations for long-term exposure to PM2.5 [β=5.33 (1.56, 9.09) mmHg] and PM10 [β=2.47 (0.10, 4.85) mmHg] on diastolic BP. Significant positive associations were observed (3,592 participants) for long-term exposure to PM10 [β=0.34 (0.19, 0.50) mmHg] and NO2 on diastolic BP [β=0.40 (0.09, 0.71) mmHg], and PM10 on systolic BP [β=0.48 (0.19, 0.77) mmHg]. The overall quality of evidence analysed was graded as "low/very low". Insufficient data for short-term exposures to PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO on BP led to their exclusion from the meta-analysis. Inconsistent associations were reported for gender-stratified results.

CONCLUSION

The evidence, though of low-quality and limited,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 15,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free