Evidence Hub

Effect of exercise intervention on anxiety among college students: a meta-analysis

Peng Chen, N. S. Mazalan, Denise Koh, Yu-Sha Gu

Frontiers in Psychology, 2025

514 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Objective This study conducted a meta-analysis to examine the impact of exercise interventions on anxiety levels among college students. Methods Under Review Manager 5.3 and Stata17.0, subgroup analyses were conducted on data from 514 subjects across 10 studies from Chinese and English literature. The analyses examined intervention content, intervention period, single intervention duration and intervention frequency. A random effects model was employed to assess the overall effect size and heterogeneity. Results The exercise intervention demonstrated a significant effect on reducing anxiety among college students, with a large effect size (d = −0.83). The heterogeneity test of intervention content (I2 = 0%) revealed high consistency in the specific content of exercise intervention across studies. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed in single intervention time (I2 = 75%), intervention frequency (I2 = 75%), and intervention period (I2 = 72%), indicating significant variations across studies. These differences suggest that varying durations, frequencies, and periods of intervention yielded different effects on college students’ anxiety levels. Conclusion This meta-analysis has found that structured physical exercise programs, especially mind–body integrative exercises, can alleviate anxiety to the greatest extent, offering evidence-based guidance for implementing targeted exercise interventions in college mental health programs. Systematic review registration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 514 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free