Evidence Hub

The epidemiology of unintentional falls among older people in the Middle East and North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

K. Chaabna, Anupama Jithesh, Salina Khawaja, Jasmine Aboughanem, R. Mamtani, Sohaila Cheema

Journal of Global Health, 2025

99 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Background Falls epidemiology in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) remains underexplored despite being a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We synthesised the data on unintentional falls among older adults in MENA countries. Methods We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression, searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to 5 May 2024, without language or time restriction. We included records on fall prevalence, frequency, location, self-reported reasons, consequences, and health care utilisation. Two reviewers independently conducted multi-stage screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. We estimated the pooled-average prevalence using random-effect models and calculated MENA population-size weighted-averages. Results We identified 7392 records, finding 90 eligible studies covering 99 588 older adults from 14 countries. The MENA population-size weighted-average prevalence of older adults with ≥1 fall was 17.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.8–36.3), with higher prevalence in older age (P = 0.001). Among fallers, 59.0% (95% CI = 40.0–76.0) reported ≥2 falls. The pooled prevalence of fallers was 60.1% (95% CI = 42.2–75.7) among older trauma unit patients, while 49.3% (95% CI = 33.9–64.8) of older outpatients reported falling in the past year. Falls occurred primarily at home (pooled-average proportion of fallers = 66.1%; 95% CI = 46.6–81.3), with fewer at work (10.1%; 95% CI = 1.6–44.2), and in hospitals…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 99 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free