Evidence Hub

Platelet parameters as potential biomarkers for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiang Tong, Sai Yang, Ji-Bo Sun, Qing-Qing Jia, Hong Fan, Zhenzhen Li

Systematic Reviews, 2025

71 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major global health issue, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited diagnostic resources. This meta-analysis evaluates platelet index ratios (mean platelet volume-to-platelet count, MPV/PLT; platelet distribution width-to-platelet count, PDW/PLT; and platelet distribution width-to-plateletcrit, PDW/PCT) as cost-effective biomarkers for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis in resource-constrained settings. A systematic search was conducted for studies evaluating platelet parameter ratios in sepsis. Inclusion criteria comprised the following: (1) cohort/case–control designs; (2) non-duplicated datasets; (3) available quantitative data for meta-analysis. Exclusion criteria included reviews, abstracts, letters to the editor, and studies with incomplete data. Synthesis methods employed random-effects models to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) and diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, etc.), with heterogeneity assessed via I-squared statistics. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger’s test. Fourteen studies were included. The results revealed that MPV/PLT ratios were significantly higher in neonatal (SMD = 1.48, P = 0.004) and adult sepsis patients (SMD = 0.35, P < 0.001) than in controls. Survivors had significantly lower MPV/PLT ratios than non-survivors in both children/neonate (SMD = 0.67, P < 0.01) and adult group (SMD = 0.41, P < 0.01), with similar trends observed in longitudinal assessments.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 71 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free