Concerns about a systematic review of mediators of PTSD treatments: A commentary on Alpert and colleagues (2023)
Abstract
The systematic review by Alpert and colleagues (Clinical Psychology Reviews, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102300) suggests methodological standards for mediation analysis and evaluates the evidence for mediation of PTSD treatment effects in published research. Although the article articulates important methodological guidelines related to timing of treatment, mediator, and outcome, it fails to incorporate the insights of causal mediation analysis into the methodological standards. In particular, the systematic review does not recognize the limitations of using time, rather than PTSD treatment type, in mediation analyses and does not include an assessment of the potential impact of uncontrolled confounding between the mediator and the outcome in the included studies. The conclusions about mediators of PTSD treatments from this systematic review should be considered carefully.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- In silico strategies for modeling RNA aptamers and predicting binding sites of their molecular targets
- Folic acid-hydrophilic polymer coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles target doxorubicin delivery
- Anti-phytopathogenic and plant growth promoting potential of endophytic fungi isolated from Dysoxylum gotadhora
- Mercury toxicity causes iron and sulfur deficiencies along with oxidative injuries in alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
- Suppression of lncRNA GAS6-AS2 alleviates sepsis-related acute kidney injury through regulating the miR-136-5p/OXSR1 axis in vitro and in vivo
- Assessing the Protective Effect of Moringa oleifera Extract against Bone Metastasis: An In Vitro Simulated Digestion Approach
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.