Evidence Hub

Impact of generative AI in medical education in India: a systematic review

Azfar Mateen, Visesh Kumar, A. K. Singh, Berendra Yadav, Mala Mahto, A. Hassan, Nazim Nasir

Frontiers Artif. Intell., 2025

8 citations

Abstract

Background The advent of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has presented a fundamental change in the approach to medical education across the world. In India, where the medical education is facing a shortage in faculties and resources, generative AI (GenAI) has the potential of transforming this. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on the impact, student readiness, and various ethical challenges and barriers of integration of AI into the medical curriculum. Methods We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched published articles in PubMed and Google Scholar from 2020 to 2025. The search yielded 19,777 articles, from which 11 studies focusing on Indian medical students were selected. The findings of these studies were analyzed using Laurillard’s six learning modes to gain a comprehensive pedagogical understanding. Result Our study revealed a significant finding: while high awareness and positive perception towards AI have been shown by Indian medical students, most of the students lack formal training. These selected studies show that the students mostly use generative AI for clearing doubts, making assignments, and self-directed learning, shifting from the ‘Acquisition’ to ‘Inquiry’ and ‘Production’ modes of Laurillard’s learning. Comparative Analysis showed that GenAI tools outperform students on standard exams, thus showing their potential. However, certain challenges also exist,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free