Evidence Hub

Glycemic response trajectories on metformin monotherapy in real-world diabetes care

Raghavan S, Liu W, Ho MR, Warsavage T, Ghosh D, Caplan L, E. B. Reusch J

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026

140,413 participants

Abstract

Objectives: Diabetes affects over 500 million people globally and glycemia is inadequately managed. Metformin is the most frequently prescribed initial treatment for type 2 diabetes globally, yet glycemic response trajectories to metformin in routine real-world care and predictors of treatment response have not been well described. We aimed to identify glycemic response trajectories in adults prescribed metformin monotherapy as initial type 2 diabetes treatment and predictors of poor glycemic response to metformin.

Design: Observational cohort study using latent class mixed models to identify hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) trajectory classes, followed by random forests machine learning to predict trajectory class membership.

Setting: US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

Participants: Adults treated with metformin alone for >30 days after diabetes diagnosis with a minimum of two HbA1c measurements from 90 days prior to two years after the first metformin prescription (N=140,413).

Exposures: Demographic, laboratory, vital sign, and comorbidity data were included as predictors of metformin response trajectory

Main Outcomes and Measures: We included all HbA1c measurements (487,604 total) for two years after metformin initiation to define metformin glycemic response trajectories.

Results: We identified three HbA1c trajectories: stably low (89.7% of sample, mean HbA1c decrease from 7.2% to 6.6%), brisk response (7.1% of sample, mean HbA1c decrease from 11.4% to 7.0%), and non-response…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 140,413 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free