Evidence Hub

Exploring the role of resilience in selective prevention intervention for adolescents at risk of depression and anxiety in Nepal: findings from a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

Rakesh Singh, Parinati Khanal, W. Tol, Philip Jefferies, M. Jordans, C. Lund

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2025

229 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of change has recently been emphasized as crucial for advancing research on preventive interventions. This study, embedded within a pilot trial, aimed to explore the mediating effects of resilience for three preventive interventions focusing on reducing the risk of adolescent depression and anxiety in Nepal. We hypothesized that the self-regulation, economic, and combined interventions would differentially increase internal and external resilience, which in turn would reduce adolescent depressive and anxiety symptoms among adolescents in Nepal, supporting to development of a testable, replicable mediation model of prevention intervention pathways. Data were collected as part of a feasibility cluster-randomized controlled trial. A total of 229 adolescents aged 13–15, identified as living in poverty and at risk of depression or anxiety, were cluster-randomized by school into three intervention arms (self-regulation, economic, combined) and a control group. Assessments for depression and anxiety symptoms, and external and internal resilience were performed at three timepoints, with a six-month interval between each. Twenty school-based group intervention sessions were conducted weekly post-baseline. Linear mixed modeling explored changes in resilience within groups. Exploratory mediation analyses were performed to examine the association between interventions (as predictors), resilience at 6 months (as mediator), and symptoms of depression and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 229 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free