Evidence Hub

Metformin-Mediated Modulation of the AMPK/mTOR Axis in Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis: A Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Investigation

Andrade LJdO, de Oliveira GCM, Bittencourt AMV, Salles OJdM, de Oliveira LM

2026

76 participants

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) is the most prevalent organ-specific autoimmune disorder worldwide, characterized by lymphocytic thyroid infiltration and the presence of circulating anti-thyroid autoantibodies. Conventional levothyroxine replacement normalizes circulating thyroid hormone levels but is fundamentally incapable of interrupting the underlying autoimmune cascade, leaving a critical therapeutic gap. Metformin, a biguanide with well-established antidiabetic properties, has emerged as a promising immunomodulatory candidate through its activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and consequent suppression of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Objective: To delineate the molecular mechanisms through which metformin engages immunological circuits in HT by integrating bulk transcriptomic profiling, network pharmacology, and molecular docking simulations targeting the AMPK/mTOR signaling axis. Methods: Four GEO datasets (n = 76 HT cases, n = 51 euthyroid controls) were integrated after ComBat batch-effect correction. Differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and multi-database metformin target curation identified 47 pharmacological intersection genes. Protein-protein interaction networks were constructed via STRING/Cytoscape, and KEGG/GO enrichment performed with clusterProfiler. Molecular docking of metformin was executed against AMPK α1β1γ1 (PDB: 4CFE) and mTOR kinase domain (PDB: 4JSP)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 76 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free