Evidence Hub

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Vaginal length and sexual function after vertical versus horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial

O. Taha, Noha Al-Okda, M. Hamdy

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2021

3 citations

Abstract

We, the Editor and Publisher of Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, have retracted the following article: Omima Tharwat Taha, Noha Al-Okda & Mostafa Ahmed Hamdy (2022) Vaginal length and sexual function after vertical versus horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42:5, 1245-1250, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1948512 Since publication, significant concerns have been raised about the integrity of the data and reported results in the article. When approached for an explanation, the authors fully cooperated with the investigation and provided responses to our queries. However, these responses have not sufficiently addressed our concerns. As we cannot confirm the validity of the trial as reported, we are therefore retracting the article. The authors have been informed of this decision. We have been informed in our decision-making by our editorial policies and COPE guidelines. The retracted article will remain online to maintain the scholarly record, but it will be digitally watermarked on each page as ‘Retracted.’

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free