Evidence Hub

Effects of Intensive Intonation Training in Transgender and Gender Diverse People Aiming for a More Feminine-Sounding Voice: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Tine Papeleu, Jennifer Oates, Peter Tomassen, Anke Adriaansen, Clara Leyns, Cassandra Alighieri, Heike Krenn, E. D'Haeseleer

Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate the effect of intonation training in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons aiming for a more feminine-sounding voice on acoustic (intonation) parameters, listener perceptions, and self-reported outcome measures.

METHOD

Thirty TGD individuals presumed male at birth with an aim of developing a more feminine-sounding voice were included and were randomly allocated to two groups. Group 1 received 4 weeks of intonation training. Group 2 received 4 weeks of intonation training after 4 weeks of sham training. Participants were recorded three or four times: baseline (before sham training; only Group 2), pre (before intonation training), Post 1 (after intonation training), and Post 2 (after 4 weeks of no intervention). Both acoustic and perceptual outcome measures were examined and analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Statistically significant increases were found for all acoustic intonation parameters. In addition, significant increases were found for the fundamental frequency values (median, percentile [pc] 25, and pc 75). The listening experiments showed a significant increase in femininity ratings and increases in all perceptual intonation parameters. Participants perceived that their voice was more in line with their gender identity, but they still needed voice and communication training (VCT).

CONCLUSION

Positive acoustic and perceptual effects were found after intonation training in TGD people…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free