Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of subserosal versus submucosal carbon nanoparticle-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (DANCE-04): A randomized clinical trial

Song Liu, Peng Song, Qiong-Yuan Hu, Feng Sun, Xiao-Feng Lu, Meng Wang, Haijian Zhao, Wenxian Guan

Surgery, 2025

50 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy in lymph node dissection, perioperative safety, and cost of subserosal and submucosal administration of carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer (cT1-4a, cNany, cM0) were randomized into subserosal or submucosal groups. Laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy was performed for each patient.

RESULTS

Between September 2023 and August 2024, 49 patients were enrolled in the subserosal group and 50 patients were enrolled in the submucosal group. The number of retrieved lymph nodes in the subserosal group was significantly greater than that in the submucosal group (36.6 ± 1.4 vs 32.2 ± 1.4, P = .02). The number of retrieved metastatic lymph nodes in the subserosal group was also significantly greater than that in the submucosal group (3.1 ± 0.6 vs 1.5 ± 0.5, P = .04). The duration of surgery in the subserosal group was shorter than that in the submucosal group (150.9 ± 3.0 minutes vs 194.7 ± 6.2 minutes, P < .001). The tracing-related cost in the subserosal group was lower than that in the submucosal group (1,824.8 ± 110.9 vs 2,395.5 ± 112.5 [in Chinese currency], P < .001), whereas the tracing-excluded cost was similar between groups. Diagnostic values, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for metastatic stations or lymph nodes, of the subserosal approach were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free