Evidence Hub

Binimetinib and encorafenib for the treatment of advanced solid tumors with non-V600E BRAF mutations (mts): Final results of the investigator-initiated phase II BEAVER trial

A. A. Rose, J. Maxwell, Emmanuelle Rousselle, M. Riaud, C. Tobin, M. Mcguire, I. King, Tong Zhang et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024

13 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

3104 Background: Oncogenic non-V600E BRAF mts are present in many cancer types. Pre-clinical data indicate that some BRAF non-V600E mts can be targeted with BRAF + MEK inhibitors. The BEAVER trial was designed to test the safety and efficacy of binimetinib and encorafenib (B+E) in patients (pts) with non-V600E BRAF mts. Safety data were previously presented [ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1053 ]. Here, we present the final analysis of the efficacy and exploratory objectives. Methods: Key eligibility criteria were: pts with advanced solid tumors with non-V600E activating (Class 1 and 2) or inhibitory (Class 3) BRAF mts, and no prior BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Pts received binimetinib (45mg PO BID) and encorafenib (450mg PO daily) on a 28-day cycle until intolerable toxicity or progression. The primary objective is OR rate (ORR) as per RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives included PFS. Log-rank test was used to assess PFS. Exploratory objectives included: development of patient derived xenograft (PDX) models, and genomic/transcriptomic profiling of tumors. Mice bearing PDXs were treated with inhibitors and tumors were measured by caliper measurement. Whole exome and RNAseq was performed on PDXs. Results: From June 2019 to Nov 2023, 27 pts were screened and 23 pts enrolled; 21 are evaluable for ORR. Tumor types were melanoma, colorectal and pancreaticobiliary (n=6 each), lung (n=2), and breast, uterine, and small bowel cancers (n=1 each).Median age was 59 yrs (range 40-73).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free