Evidence Hub

Long term outcomes of intracarotid arterial transfusion of circulatory-derived autologous CD34 + cells for acute ischemic stroke patients—A randomized, open-label, controlled phase II clinical trial

Hung-Sheng Lin, P. Sung, Shu-Hua Huang, Wei-Che Lin, J. Y. Chiang, M. Ma, Yi-Ling Chen, Kuan-Hung Chen et al.

Stem cell research & therapeutics, 2024

4 citations

Abstract

This phase II randomized controlled trial tested whether the intracarotid arterial administration (ICAA) of autologous CD34 + cells to patients within 14 ± 7 days after acute ischemic stroke (IS) could be safe and further improve short- and long-term outcomes. Between January 2018 and March 2022, 28 consecutive patients were equally randomly allocated to the cell-treated group (CD34 + cells/3.0 × 107/patient) or the control group (receiving optimal medical therapy). CD34 + cells were transfused into the ipsilateral brain infarct zone of cell-treated patients via the ICAA in the catheterization room. The results demonstrated 100% safety and success rates for the procedure, and no long-term tumorigenesis was observed in cell-treated patients. In cell-treated patients, the angiogenesis capacity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)/Matrigel was significantly greater after treatment than before treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (all p < 0.001). Blood samples from the right internal jugular vein of the cell-treated patients presented significantly greater levels of the stromal cell-derived factor 1α/EPC at 5, 10 and 30 min compared with 0 min (all p < 0.005). The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores were similar upon presentation, but a greater response was observed by Days 30 and 90 in the cell-treated group than in the control group. Tc-99 m brain perfusion was significantly greater at 180 days in the cell-treated group than in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free