Evidence Hub

Analysis of cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of patients with ITP in a tertiary care center

Irene Castaño Caballero, Gala Cabirta Touzon, Manuel Guillermo Rodríguez López, Raquel Ocampo Martínez, Carmen Albo López

Blood, 2025

55 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a higher risk of thrombosis in ITP compared to general population, but little is known about the risk factors (RF) for thrombosis in these patients, except in splenectomises. Lambert et al1 (Eur J Haematol. 2023, DOI 10.1111/ejh.14154) report RF common to those in general population and emphasize the importance of personalized approach, with adequate control of comorbidities in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cardiovascular RF (RFCV) in a cohort of adults with ITP as part of their comprehensive care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective collection of data from electronic medical records of 55 adults followed in the outpatient clinic of 3rd level center. Data analysis with ChatGPT4o (OpenAI), which proposes statistical analyses based on the data collected. Our results are compared with those reported by Gonçalves et al2, RPTH (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102342, Zhou et al3, Hematology (2025), https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2025.2472461 and Lambert et al.

RESULTS

We analised 31 men and 24 women. Mean Age ± SD: 63.4 ± 19.5 years, Median (IQR): 67.5 (47.0–78.0) years. Patients ≥60 years have higher prevalence of CVRF, use of agonists, and higher frequency of thrombotic events (27.3% vs 4.5%). Mean age of patients who suffer a thrombotic event is 77.6 years (median 79.0) vs. 60.2 years (median 64) for patients without thrombosis (p 0.0066, Mann-Whitney). Advanced age is a thrombotic RF in patients with ITP, similar to that reported in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 55 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free