Evidence Hub

Recruitment, response rates and characteristics of 5511 people enrolled in a prospective clinical cohort study: head and neck 5000

A. Ness, A. Waylen, K. Hurley, M. Jeffreys, C. Penfold, M. Pring, S. Leary, C. Allmark et al.

Clinical Otolaryngology, 2016

5,511 participants · 46 citations

Abstract

Citation for published version (Harvard): Ness, AR, Waylen, A, Hurley, K, Jeffreys, M, Penfold, C, Pring, M, Leary, SD, Allmark, C, Toms, S, Ring, S, Peters, TJ, Hollingworth, W, Worthington, H, Nutting, C, Fisher, S, Rogers, SN, Thomas, SJ, Mehanna, H & 5000 Study Team, HAN 2016, 'Recruitment, response rates and characteristics of 5511 people enrolled in a prospective clinical cohort study: head and neck 5000', Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 804-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12548

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,511 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free